![]() While there are some morons there like any public or near-public space, it’s an overall positive and progressive group of people. People at The Reaper Forums are awesome folks. Geoffrey Francis, if you read this, I am willing to offer much more specific and targeted criticism with examples if it would help improve the user guide. I always prefer to read manuals than watch videos, but Kenny’s Reaper Videos are vastly superior to the User Guide, even for someone that hates watching videos. It do appreciate that the manual exists, but it’s yet to serve me any purpose other than to frustrate and confuse. Images/descriptions across page/spine boundaries.Information for some functions is “hidden” in walk-throughs that a more experienced user may not think to look at.Frequent terminology mistakes ( or is it Reaper that’s wrong?).Typographic disaster - This could have a whole post itself.Way too many walk-throughs instead of technical information.Presence of images can turn an explanation to 2 words per line. The formatting is inconsistent (I’ve checked multiple PDF renderers).Reaper’s User Guide is quite poor and the thanklessness of the job will continue. Yes, I have high-standards for technical documentation, since I basically read every manual of every item that I own (I am not exaggerating). Unfortunately those things do not change the fact that the Reaper User-Guide is not very good. It’s not easy, it’s thankless and it’s tiring. Let me start out by saying that I understand how much work it is to write and maintain a technical document for such a large piece of software. This section is becoming disheartening to continue writing. ![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |